To be honest, I've had problems getting excited in the past about XOOPS as a CMS or as an open source community. There just didn't seem to be a whole lot of buzz about this CMS and I was seriously thinking about dropping it from my personal "top 30 list" found to the left under "CMS Focus".
The biggest reward I get from working on IT projects is the opportunity to take new ideas and new strategies and piece them together into something that has never been done before. Even when I'm not the one originating the new idea, I like helping other innovative people bring their ideas to the table. I have ideas, dreams, and aspirations to help take my workplace to the next level of where it should be via innovative use of what I know best, information technology. How could innovation and all these wonderful ideas I have in my head not be anything but a good thing for my organization? A recent article in the Wall Street Journal answers just that question by saying that there are negatives for an organi
I came across a well written summary of content management applications (especially open source CMS) via a Security Blog over at GLORIAD. The CMS article is a near perfect overview on the state of CMS in 2007. This article is a "must read" in my opinion and it's really too bad I didn't write it first. Can you tell I'm envious?
At the end of the article the author concludes:
I must confess, I really don't fully understand how the Internet ranking systems actually work. Ranking systems such as Google's PageRank and Alexa's Traffic Rankings seem to use a mystery of statistical analysis, algorithms, and a sprinkle of voodoo calculus to come up with the numbers they do. Although most people lack the understanding to how these numbers are derived it is still fun to watch those rankings change from day to day. For example, since the Fall of 2006 I've seen the rankings for CMSReport.com change from 830,790 to around a steady 90,000.
Recently, I read some good posts regarding content management systems (CMS) on a few blogs I visit almost daily. The posts have had me thinking and reflecting in general about CMS. However, I won't talk too much about them so you get a chance to go on and read the articles yourself. The first post comes from OpenSourceCommunity.org and the second post from Gadgetopia.
Collaboration. Everyone wants to do it better. Collaboration. Everyone wants to find that perfect online tool which can support needed communication necessary for good collaboration . Collaboration. Every company in the business wants to provide you their tool to help you make collaboration work for you.
Perhaps ReviewBasics might be just the communication tool you're looking for to meet your collaboration requirements. Tim Shih, SharpStyle Labs, has been wanting me to take a look at their collaboration feedback tool, ReviewBasics. Mr. Shih writes:
I list exactly 30 different content management systems at my site under the "CMS Focus" banner here at CMSReport.com. My list does not necessarily include the top CMS out there, but those CMS that I currently find of interest. A few of the applications I currently list have dropped off my radar scope and no longer impress me as a CMS I want to spend my time taking about. So I'm currently looking at replacing a few of the CMS I have listed with other applications.
If you had the power to add a CMS I currently don't have listed, which CMS would that be?